AI News, 20 Must artificial intelligence

Technological singularity

According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, called intelligence explosion, an upgradable intelligent agent (such as a computer running software-based artificial general intelligence) would enter a 'runaway reaction' of self-improvement cycles, with each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an intelligence explosion and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that would, qualitatively, far surpass all human intelligence.

Stanislaw Ulam reports a discussion with von Neumann 'centered on the accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue'.[5]

The concept and the term 'singularity' were popularized by Vernor Vinge in his 1993 essay The Coming Technological Singularity, in which he wrote that it would signal the end of the human era, as the new superintelligence would continue to upgrade itself and would advance technologically at an incomprehensible rate.

If a superhuman intelligence were to be invented—either through the amplification of human intelligence or through artificial intelligence—it would bring to bear greater problem-solving and inventive skills than current humans are capable of.

These iterations of recursive self-improvement could accelerate, potentially allowing enormous qualitative change before any upper limits imposed by the laws of physics or theoretical computation set in.

These iterations of recursive self-improvement accelerate, allowing enormous qualitative change before any upper limits imposed by the laws of physics or theoretical computation set in.[16]

A number of futures studies scenarios combine elements from both of these possibilities, suggesting that humans are likely to interface with computers, or upload their minds to computers, in a way that enables substantial intelligence amplification.

The means speculated to produce intelligence augmentation are numerous, and include bioengineering, genetic engineering, nootropic drugs, AI assistants, direct brain–computer interfaces and mind uploading.

Hanson (1998) is skeptical of human intelligence augmentation, writing that once one has exhausted the 'low-hanging fruit' of easy methods for increasing human intelligence, further improvements will become increasingly difficult to find.

The exponential growth in computing technology suggested by Moore's law is commonly cited as a reason to expect a singularity in the relatively near future, and a number of authors have proposed generalizations of Moore's law.

Ray Kurzweil postulates a law of accelerating returns in which the speed of technological change (and more generally, all evolutionary processes[33]) increases exponentially, generalizing Moore's law in the same manner as Moravec's proposal, and also including material technology (especially as applied to nanotechnology), medical technology and others.[34]

Kurzweil reserves the term 'singularity' for a rapid increase in artificial intelligence (as opposed to other technologies), writing for example that 'The Singularity will allow us to transcend these limitations of our biological bodies and brains ...

He also defines his predicted date of the singularity (2045) in terms of when he expects computer-based intelligences to significantly exceed the sum total of human brainpower, writing that advances in computing before that date 'will not represent the Singularity' because they do 'not yet correspond to a profound expansion of our intelligence.'[37]

In one of the first uses of the term 'singularity' in the context of technological progress, Stanislaw Ulam tells of a conversation with John von Neumann about accelerating change: One conversation centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue.[5]

He predicts paradigm shifts will become increasingly common, leading to 'technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history'.[38]

First, it does not require external influence: machines designing faster hardware would still require humans to create the improved hardware, or to program factories appropriately.[citation needed]

While not actively malicious, there is no reason to think that AIs would actively promote human goals unless they could be programmed as such, and if not, might use the resources currently used to support mankind to promote its own goals, causing human extinction.[46][47][48]

Carl Shulman and Anders Sandberg suggest that algorithm improvements may be the limiting factor for a singularity because whereas hardware efficiency tends to improve at a steady pace, software innovations are more unpredictable and may be bottlenecked by serial, cumulative research.

They suggest that in the case of a software-limited singularity, intelligence explosion would actually become more likely than with a hardware-limited singularity, because in the software-limited case, once human-level AI was developed, it could run serially on very fast hardware, and the abundance of cheap hardware would make AI research less constrained.[49]

Some critics, like philosopher Hubert Dreyfus, assert that computers or machines can't achieve human intelligence, while others, like physicist Stephen Hawking, hold that the definition of intelligence is irrelevant if the net result is the same.[51]

Look at domed cities, jet-pack commuting, underwater cities, mile-high buildings, and nuclear-powered automobiles—all staples of futuristic fantasies when I was a child that have never arrived.

Andrey Korotayev and others argue that historical hyperbolic growth curves can be attributed to feedback loops that ceased to affect global trends in the 1970s, and thus hyperbolic growth should not be expected in the future.[60][61]

In a detailed empirical accounting, The Progress of Computing, William Nordhaus argued that, prior to 1940, computers followed the much slower growth of a traditional industrial economy, thus rejecting extrapolations of Moore's law to 19th-century computers.[62]

In a 2007 paper, Schmidhuber stated that the frequency of subjectively 'notable events' appears to be approaching a 21st-century singularity, but cautioned readers to take such plots of subjective events with a grain of salt: perhaps differences in memory of recent and distant events could create an illusion of accelerating change where none exists.[63]

Gordon, in The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War (2016), points out that measured economic growth has slowed around 1970 and slowed even further since the financial crisis of 2008, and argues that the economic data show no trace of a coming Singularity as imagined by mathematician I.J.

In the current stage of life's evolution, the carbon-based biosphere has generated a cognitive system (humans) capable of creating technology that will result in a comparable evolutionary transition.

Evolution has no inherent tendency to produce outcomes valued by humans, and there is little reason to expect an arbitrary optimisation process to promote an outcome desired by mankind, rather than inadvertently leading to an AI behaving in a way not intended by its creators (such as Nick Bostrom's whimsical example of an AI which was originally programmed with the goal of manufacturing paper clips, so that when it achieves superintelligence it decides to convert the entire planet into a paper clip manufacturing facility).[76][77][78]

We tell it to solve a mathematical problem, and it complies by turning all the matter in the solar system into a giant calculating device, in the process killing the person who asked the question.

While both require large advances in recursive optimisation process design, friendly AI also requires the ability to make goal structures invariant under self-improvement (or the AI could transform itself into something unfriendly) and a goal structure that aligns with human values and does not automatically destroy the human race.

One hypothetical approach towards attempting to control an artificial intelligence is an AI box, where the artificial intelligence is kept constrained inside a simulated world and not allowed to affect the external world.

Hawking believed that in the coming decades, AI could offer 'incalculable benefits and risks' such as 'technology outsmarting financial markets, out-inventing human researchers, out-manipulating human leaders, and developing weapons we cannot even understand.'

In a hard takeoff scenario, an AGI rapidly self-improves, 'taking control' of the world (perhaps in a matter of hours), too quickly for significant human-initiated error correction or for a gradual tuning of the AGI's goals.

In a soft takeoff scenario, AGI still becomes far more powerful than humanity, but at a human-like pace (perhaps on the order of decades), on a timescale where ongoing human interaction and correction can effectively steer the AGI's development.[91][92]

Naam further points out that the computational complexity of higher intelligence may be much greater than linear, such that 'creating a mind of intelligence 2 is probably more than twice as hard as creating a mind of intelligence 1.'[94]

Storrs Hall believes that 'many of the more commonly seen scenarios for overnight hard takeoff are circular – they seem to assume hyperhuman capabilities at the starting point of the self-improvement process' in order for an AI to be able to make the dramatic, domain-general improvements required for takeoff.

Hall suggests that rather than recursively self-improving its hardware, software, and infrastructure all on its own, a fledgling AI would be better off specializing in one area where it was most effective and then buying the remaining components on the marketplace, because the quality of products on the marketplace continually improves, and the AI would have a hard time keeping up with the cutting-edge technology used by the rest of the world.[95]

Even if all superfast AIs worked on intelligence augmentation, it's not clear why they would do better in a discontinuous way than existing human cognitive scientists at producing super-human intelligence, although the rate of progress would increase.

Eric Drexler, one of the founders of nanotechnology, postulated cell repair devices, including ones operating within cells and utilizing as yet hypothetical biological machines, in his 1986 book Engines of Creation.

Beyond merely extending the operational life of the physical body, Jaron Lanier argues for a form of immortality called 'Digital Ascension' that involves 'people dying in the flesh and being uploaded into a computer and remaining conscious'.[101]

In his 1958 obituary for John von Neumann, Ulam recalled a conversation with von Neumann about the 'ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life, which gives the appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue.'[5]

Golem XIV was originally created to aid its builders in fighting wars, but as its intelligence advances to a much higher level than that of humans, it stops being interested in the military requirement because it finds them lacking internal logical consistency.

When this happens, human history will have reached a kind of singularity, an intellectual transition as impenetrable as the knotted space-time at the center of a black hole, and the world will pass far beyond our understanding.

In 1985, in 'The Time Scale of Artificial Intelligence', artificial intelligence researcher Ray Solomonoff articulated mathematically the related notion of what he called an 'infinity point': if a research community of human-level self-improving AIs take four years to double their own speed, then two years, then one year and so on, their capabilities increase infinitely in finite time.[6][104]

Vinge argues that science-fiction authors cannot write realistic post-singularity characters who surpass the human intellect, as the thoughts of such an intellect would be beyond the ability of humans to express.[7]

In 2009, Kurzweil and X-Prize founder Peter Diamandis announced the establishment of Singularity University, a nonaccredited private institute whose stated mission is 'to educate, inspire and empower leaders to apply exponential technologies to address humanity's grand challenges.'[108]

The not-for-profit organization runs an annual ten-week graduate program during summer that covers ten different technology and allied tracks, and a series of executive programs throughout the year.

20 Best Grammar Checker Software Solutions for 2019

Whether you are writing for professional publications or communicating with your superiors, colleagues or family and friends, what you want to say is best dressed in clear, coherent language.

Unlike other applications, language tools are notoriously more open to any number of approaches and interpretations, which means that most often you will find quirks in some of their suggestions—hence, you need to carefully select the ones that also reflects your own preferred style.

One that easily comes to mind is the rising demand for English competency among non-English speaking countries whose own people are seeking admission to higher education in English-speaking nations and the publication of professional dissertation papers related to their respective disciplines.

From the foregoing discussion, it makes enough sense, then, for us to score these grammar check offerings that are hitting the market and compile this 20 best grammar check software solutions to help you decide which one suits best your needs.

If you’re probably thinking where to open shop abroad with the most number of non-native English speakers, the chart below, released in 2018, shows the English proficiency ranking of non-native-speaking countries at the regional level: But even us native speakers in the U.S. would do well to use a grammar checker if writing isn’t our professional training.

From the time Grammarly was launched in 2009, it has steadily expanded its accuracy and capabilities, and users have paid the company its due, being consistently ranked at the top of the pack of grammar checking software lists.

The original line makes for a direct spot in some dark humor forum, while the corrected one enables you to breathe a sigh of relief and to salvage some measure of legitimacy in your budding writing career.

The open source sector is well represented in the grammar checker software scene through LanguageTool, which can be used as a plugin for Chrome, Firefox, LibreOffice, OpenOffice, as standalone dedicated desktop application, or as an integrated program on websites.

If you have a strange tendency to use wordy sentences, drive away readers by employing dull or complicated words, have a standing fetish for adverbs and an unhealthy fascination with passive voice, you have a lot to gain by accessing Hemingway Editor online, or by simply installing the stand-alone desktop version.

If you are used to the other entries of our top 20 grammar checker software solutions list with all their bells and whistles, you can be forgiven for assuming that the utter simplicity of OnlineCorrrection.com makes it the lightest weight and so-so package of the lot.

Even with all the spate of grammar checking tools sprouting all over the place, it’s probably safe to say no self-respecting writer would stand behind all the corrected output returned by any of the software packages out there.

The huge number of features it offers—check spelling, check grammar and punctuation, check paraphrasing, improve word choice, self-assess the use of target structures, and master English pronunciation—would probably convert to a few actual months enrollment time in a physical school equivalent.

Someone somewhere has probably made a compendium of cheeky renditions by Microsoft Word’s proofing tool, but for many night owls who have spent countless intimate nights with the application, such are the foibles of an old friend who refuses to play out of character, ever.

If it’s not the nostalgic value, Slick Write has another gem up its sleeve to tug at the heartstrings of word crafters—bloggers, writers, novelists, SEO professionals, and students—everywhere: a feature to take care of the old devil itself called the writer’s block.

button, you can sit safe in the knowledge that it’s not some clueless cave shaman who pulled off some crude crystal and divined the clouds above who would serve you but After the Deadline, an open source program that utilizes artificial intelligence and natural language processing technology to identify errors in your writing.

We mentioned WordStar and XyWrite earlier, but Corel made sure WordPerfect Office X8 would not join its near-extinct contemporaries by expanding, updating, and enhancing WordPerfect Office with compelling features to make sure business professionals, academics, and others would keep the application on their radar.

How artificial intelligence will change your world in 2019, for better or worse

From a science fiction dream to a critical part of our everyday lives, artificial intelligence is everywhere. You probably don't see AI at work, and that's by design.

Artificial Intelligence: Mankind's Last Invention

Artificial Intelligence: Mankind's Last Invention - Technological Singularity Explained Signup and get 20% off a premium subscription! ..

Joe Rogan - Elon Musk on Artificial Intelligence

Taken from Joe Rogan Experience #1169:

The Real Reason to be Afraid of Artificial Intelligence | Peter Haas | TEDxDirigo

A robotics researcher afraid of robots, Peter Haas, invites us into his world of understand where the threats of robots and artificial intelligence lie. Before we get ...

Top 10 Scary Things Robots Have Said

Top 10 Scary Things Robots Have Said Subscribe To The Vlog Channel: Hello and welcome back to the Most Amazing Channel on the ..

5 Wonderful Humanoid Robots With Emotions & Artificial Intelligence - Best Robots #223 [CRAZY HD]

Life hack - How to make Pomegranate juice by hands - less than 2 minutes [CRAZY HD] Links: 1 - Xiaomi Mi ..

Elon Musk's Last Warning About Artificial Intelligence

Elon Musk Merchandise Store: Badass T-Shirts, Mugs and Smartphone cases: Christmas Merch for your .

Should you learn Ai and Machine Learning?

What are the Ai and machine learning job opportunities today?

The Next Frontier Of Artificial Intelligence Is Here, And Its A Bit Eerie

Hello, welcome to NeoScribe. Using our imagination is easy. We can all close our eyes, and think of ice cream, or cake, or even better, cake and ice cream.

EXAMINING: Is Artificial Intelligence The Future of Music?

TWITTER: Today's episode of Examining is all about robots! As AI has become nearly inescapable in our everyday lives, several ..